| Issue |
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 13, 2022
EU PVSEC 2021: State of the Art and Developments in Photovoltaics
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 11 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2022006 | |
| Published online | 25 May 2022 | |
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, A. Jäger-Waldau, PV status report 2019, Publications Office, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/326629 [Google Scholar]
- R.M. Swanson, Approaching the 29% limit efficiency of silicon solar cells, in Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005 [Google Scholar]
- S. Kim, T.T. Trinh, J. Park et al., Over 30% efficiency bifacial 4-terminal perovskite-heterojunction silicon tandem solar cells with spectral albedo, Sci. Rep. 11, 15524 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.D. Rodríguez-Gallegos, M. Bieri, O. Gandhi, J. Prakash Singh, T. Reindl, S.K. Panda, Monofacial vs bifacial Si-based PV modules: which one is more cost-effective? Solar Energy 176, 412 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Coletti et al., Bifacial four-terminal perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells and modules, ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1676 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Chantana, Y. Kawano, T. Nishimura, A. Mavlonov, T. Minemoto, Optimized bandgaps of top and bottom subcells for bifacial two-terminal tandem solar cells under different back irradiances, Solar Energy 220, 163 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.L. Luxembourg, D. Zhang, M. Najafi et al., Perovskite/Crystalline silicon tandems: impact of perovskite bandgap and crystalline silicon cell architecture, in 33rd EUPVSEC 2017, https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20172017-3DV.2.70 [Google Scholar]
- M.H. Futscher, B. Ehrler, Efficiency limit of Perovskite/Si tandem solar cells, ACS Energy Lett. 1, 863 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Zhang, M. Najafi, V. Zardetto et al., High efficiency 4-terminal perovskite/c-Si tandem cells, SEM&SC 1880, 1 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- V. Zardetto et al., Towards large area stable perovskite solar cells and modules, in 48th IEEE PVSEC 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc40753.2019.8981217 [Google Scholar]
- B.B. Van Aken, M.J. Jansen, A.J. Carr, G.J.M. Janssen, A.A. Mewe, Relation between indoor flash testing and outdoor performance of bifacial modules, in Proceedings of the 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference (2014), pp. 2399–2402 [Google Scholar]
- www.iec.ch [Google Scholar]
- S. Ponce-Alcantara, G. Sanchez, J.P. Conelly, J.M.M. Novoa, A statistical analysis of the temperature coefficients of industrial silicon solar cells, Energy Procedia 55, 578 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Lin, N.M. Ravindra, Temperature dependence of CIGS and perovskite solar cell performance: an overview, SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1361 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Virtuani, H. Mullejans, E.D. Dunlop, Comparison of indoor and outdoor performance measurements of recent commercially available solar modules, Progr. Photovolt. 19, 11 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- C. Deline, S. Macalpine, B. Marion, F. Toor, A. Asgharzadeh, J.S. Stein, Assessment of bifacial photovoltaic module power rating methodologies-inside and out, IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 575 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.