EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 17 (2026) EPJ Photovolt., 17 (2026) 21 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 17, 2026
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2026013
Published online 13 May 2026
  1. B. Latour, S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Lemieux, À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses?, Mil neuf cent 25, 191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3917/mnc.025.0191 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Chateauraynaud, Sociologie argumentative et dynamique des controverses : l’exemple de l’argument climatique dans la relance de l’énergie nucléaire en Europe, A contrario 16, 131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3917/aco.112.0131 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Goetzberger, A. Zastrow, On the coexistence of solar-energy conversion and plant cultivation, Int. J. Sol. Energy 1, 55 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1080/01425918208909875 [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Dupraz, H. Marrou, G. Talbot, L. Dufour, A. Nogier, Y. Ferard, Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: towards new agrivoltaic schemes, Renew. Energy 36, 2725 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Prakash, M.M. Lunagaria, A.P. Trivedi, A. Upadhyaya, R. Kumar, A. Das, A.K. Gupta, Y. Kumar, Shading and PAR under different density agrivoltaic systems, their simulation and effect on wheat productivity, Eur. J. Agron. 149, 126922 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126922 [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Alam, N.Z. Butt, How does module tracking for agrivoltaics differ from standard photovoltaics? Food, energy, and technoeconomic implications, Renew. Energy 235, 121151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121151 [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Elamri, B. Cheviron, J.-M. Lopez, C. Dejean, G. Belaud, Water budget and crop modelling for agrivoltaic systems: application to irrigated lettuces, Agric. Water Manag. 208, 440 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018. 07.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Valle, T. Simonneau, F. Sourd, P. Pechier, P. Hamard, T. Frisson, M. Ryckewaert, A. Christophe, Increasing the total productivity of a land by combining mobile photovoltaic panels and food crops, Appl. Energy 206, 1495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.113 [Google Scholar]
  10. F.J. Casares de la Torre, M. Varo, R. López-Luque, J. Ramírez-Faz, L.M. Fernández-Ahumada, Design and analysis of a tracking/backtracking strategy for PV plants after conversion to agrivoltaic plants, Renew. Energy 187, 537 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.081 [Google Scholar]
  11. R.K. Lama, H. Jeong, Design and performance analysis of foldable solar panel for agrivoltaics system, Sensors 24, 1167 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041167 [Google Scholar]
  12. O. Essahili, M. Ouafi, O. Moudam, Recent progress in organic luminescent solar concentrators for agrivoltaics: opportunities for rare-earth complexes, Sol. Energy 245, 58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.08.054 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Gorjian, E. Bousi, Ö.E. Özdemir, M. Trommsdorff, N.M. Kumar, A. Anand, K. Kant, S.S. Chopra, Progress and challenges of crop production and electricity generation in agrivoltaic systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 158, 112126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112126 [Google Scholar]
  14. A.A.F. Husain, W.Z.W. Hasan, S. Shafie, M.N. Hamidon, S.S. Pandey, A review of transparent solar photovoltaic technologies, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 94, 779 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.031 [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Grimonprez, Agrivoltaïsme : vers un nouvel horizon juridique, in Rencontres de Droit Rural (Agridées, Paris, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Gosse, Sous les navets, la plage ? La recherche d’une conciliation entre agriculture et transition énergétique : le cas du photovoltaïque en zone agricole, Rev. Jurid. Environ. HS1, 143 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. de Falco, M. Sarrica, A. Scognamiglio, R. Fasanelli, What does agrivoltaics mean? A study on social representations shared by experts and the press in Italy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 119, 103918 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103918 [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Swanson, C. Seay-Fleming, A.K. Gerlak, G.A. Barron-Gafford, “Enough is enough, we like our farms”: the role of landscape ideology in shaping perceptions of solar energy and agrivoltaics in the rural American Southwest, J. Rural Stud. 114, 103572 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103572 [Google Scholar]
  19. H.H. Zeddies, M. Parlasca, M. Qaim, Agrivoltaics increases public acceptance of solar energy production on agricultural land, Land Use Policy 156, 107604 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107604 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Li, Z. Gou, Accepting solar photovoltaic panels in rural landscapes: the tangle among nostalgia, morality, and economic stakes, Land 12, 1956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101956 [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Sirnik, D. Oudes, S. Stremke, Agrivoltaics and landscape change : first evidence from built cases in the Netherlands, Land Use Policy 140, 107099 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107099 [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Biró-Varga, I. Sirnik, S. Stremke, Landscape user experiences of agrivoltaics: a comparative analysis of two novel types of solar landscapes in the Netherlands, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 109, 103408 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103408 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Seay-Fleming, T. Swanson, A.K. Gerlak, M.A. Pavao-Zuckerman, H. Andrews, K. Moore, G.A. Barron-Gafford, Cultivating engagement: public participation in agrivoltaics planning and design, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 127, 104273 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104273 [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Torma, J. Aschemann-Witzel, Social acceptance of dual land use approaches: stakeholders’ perceptions of the drivers and barriers confronting agrivoltaics diffusion, J. Rural Stud. 97, 610 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud. 2023.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Sirnik, J. Sluijsmans, D. Oudes, S. Stremke, Circularity and landscape experience of agrivoltaics: a systematic review of literature and built systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 178, 113250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113250 [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Taylor, J. Pettit, T. Sekiyama, M.M. Sokołowski, Justice-driven agrivoltaics: facilitating agrivoltaics embedded in energy justice, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 188, 113815 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113815 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Batel, Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: past, present and future, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544 [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Gendron, Penser l’acceptabilité sociale : au-delà de l’intérêt, les valeurs, Communiquer 11, 117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.584 [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Devine-Wright, B. Wiersma, Understanding community acceptance of a potential offshore wind energy project in different locations: An island-based analysis of ‘place-technology fit.’, Energy Policy 137, 111086 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111086 [Google Scholar]
  30. M.-J. Fortin, Les paysages de la transition énergétique : une perspective politique, Projets paysage 10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4000/paysage.11622 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Hrabanski, Une climatisation des enjeux agricoles par la science? Les controverses relatives à la climate-smart agriculture, Crit. Int. 86, 189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.086.0189 [Google Scholar]
  32. Haut Conseil pour le Climat, Accélérer la transition climatique (2024) [Google Scholar]
  33. R.E. Green, S.J. Cornell, J.P.W. Scharlemann, Farming and the fate of wild nature, Science 307, 550 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106049 [Google Scholar]
  34. D. Scott, A. Smith, “Sacrifice zones” in the green energy economy: toward an environmental justice framework, McGill Law J. 62, 861 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  35. D. van Meer, C. Zografos, “Take your responsibility”: the politics of green sacrifice for just low-carbon transitions in rural Portugal, Sustain. Sci. 19, 1313 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01519-0 [Google Scholar]
  36. C.R. Warren, R. Loraamm, T. Gliedt, ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland, J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 48, 853 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376 [Google Scholar]
  37. C. Burch et al., The “green on green” conflict in wind energy development: a case study of environmentally conscious individuals in Oklahoma, USA, Sustainability 12, 8184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198184 [Google Scholar]
  38. R. Carrausse, À l’ombre des panneaux solaires, l’agrivoltaïsme. Retour sur une trajectoire sociotechnique de légitimation, Dév. Durable Territ. 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.4000/13cqb [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Hrabanski, A. Ducastel, S. Verdeil, Agrivoltaics in France: the multi-level and uncertain regulation of an energy decarbonisation policy, Rev. Agric. Food Environ. Stud. 105, 45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-024-00204-1 [Google Scholar]
  40. P. Roddis, K. Roelich, K. Tran, S. Carver, M. Dallimer, G. Ziv, What shapes community acceptance of solar farms? Sol. Energy 209, 235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.065 [Google Scholar]
  41. V. Alcaide Lozano, S. Fachelli, P. López-Roldán, The typological paragon: a methodological proposal of mixed designs, Bull. Sociol. Methodol. 141, 64 (2019). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26641179 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.