EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 17 (2026) EPJ Photovolt., 17 (2026) 7 References
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 17, 2026
Special Issue on ‘EU PVSEC 2025: State of the Art and Developments in Photovoltaics', edited by Robert Kenny and Carlos del Cañizo
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2025029
Published online 06 February 2026
  1. C. Ma, Z. Deng, X. Xu, X. Pang, X. Li, R. Wu, Z. Tian, Space optimization of utility-scale photovoltaic power plants considering the impact of inter-row shading, Appl. Energy. 370, 123591 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123591 [Google Scholar]
  2. Y.-M. Saint-Drenan, T. Barbier, Data-analysis and modelling of the effect of inter-row shading on the power production of photovoltaic plants, Sol. Energy 184, 127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.086 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Barbón, V. Carreira-Fontao, L. Bayón, C.A. Silva, Optimal design and cost analysis of single-axis tracking photovoltaic power plants, Renew. Energy. 211, 626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.110 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Buerhop‐Lutz, O. Stroyuk, O. Mashkov, J.A. Hauch, I.M. Peters, Unveiling the potential of ultraviolet fluorescence imaging as a versatile inspection tool: insights from extensive photovoltaic module inspections in multi‐MWp photovoltaic power stations, Sol. RRL 8, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202400566 [Google Scholar]
  5. D.J. Colvin, A.M. Gabor, W.C. Oltjen, P.J. Knodle, A.D. Yao, B.A. Thompson, N. Khan, S. Lotfian, J. Raby, A. Jojo, X. Yu, M. Liggett, H.P. Seigneur, R.H. French, L.S. Bruckman, M. Li, K.O. Davis, Ultraviolet fluorescence imaging for photovoltaic module metrology: best practices and survey of features observed in fielded modules, IEEE J. Photovolt 15, 465 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2025.3545825 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Morlier, M. Siebert, I. Kunze, G. Mathiak, M. Kontges, Detecting photovoltaic module failures in the field during daytime with ultraviolet fluorescence module inspection, IEEE J. Photovolt 7, 1710 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2017.2756452 [Google Scholar]
  7. U. Desai, B.K. Sharma, A. Singh, Assessment of the effect of accelerated ultraviolet aging on mini‐PV modules encapsulated with different poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) formulations, J. Appl. Polym. Sci 140, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.54676 [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Peike, T. Kaltenbach, K.-A. Weiß, M. Koehl, Non-destructive degradation analysis of encapsulants in PV modules by Raman Spectroscopy, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 1686 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.01.030 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Koester, S. Lindig, A. Louwen, A. Astigarraga, G. Manzolini, D. Moser, Review of photovoltaic module degradation, field inspection techniques and techno-economic assessment, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 165, 112616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112616 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.M. Rahman, I. Khan, K. Alameh, Potential measurement techniques for photovoltaic module failure diagnosis: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 151, 111532 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111532 [Google Scholar]
  11. M.C.C. de Oliveira, A.S.A. Diniz Cardoso, M.M. Viana, V. de F.C. Lins, The causes and effects of degradation of encapsulant ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 81, 2299 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.039 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Jiang, K. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Ding, Q. Yu, Encapsulation of PV modules using ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer as the encapsulant, Macromol. React. Eng 9, 522 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/mren.201400065 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Ebnesajjad, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF), Encycl. Polym. Sci. Technol (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst388.pub2 [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Uličná, M. Owen-Bellini, S.L. Moffitt, A. Sinha, J. Tracy, K. Royo-Choudhury, D.C. Miller, P. Hacke, L.T. Schelhas, A study of degradation mechanisms in PVDF-based photovoltaic backsheets, Sci. Rep 12, 14399 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18477-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Bosco, J. Tracy, R. Dauskardt, Environmental influence on module delamination rate, IEEE J. Photovolt 9, 469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2018.2877436 [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Al Mahdi, P.G. Leahy, M. Alghoul, A.P. Morrison, A review of photovoltaic module failure and degradation mechanisms: causes and detection techniques, Solar 4, 43 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Meena, A. Pareek, R. Gupta, A comprehensive review on interfacial delamination in photovoltaic modules, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 189, 113944 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113944 [Google Scholar]
  18. E.W. Ciurczak, B. Igne, J. Workman Jr, D.A. Burns, Handbook of near-infrared analysis (CRC press, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Pasquini, Near infrared spectroscopy: a mature analytical technique with new perspectives – a review, Anal. Chim. Acta 1026, 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.04.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Ozaki, C. Huck, S. Tsuchikawa, S.B. Engelsen, Near-infrared spectroscopy: theory, spectral analysis, instrumentation, and applications (Springer Nature, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. K.S. Anderson, C.W. Hansen, W.F. Holmgren, A.R. Jensen, M.A. Mikofski, A. Driesse, pvlib python: 2023 project update, J. Open Source Softw 8, 5994 (2023). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05994 [Google Scholar]
  22. A.R. Jensen, K.S. Anderson, W.F. Holmgren, M.A. Mikofski, C.W. Hansen, L.J. Boeman, R. Loonen, pvlib iotools—Open-source Python functions for seamless access to solar irradiance data, Sol. Energy 266, 112092 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112092 [Google Scholar]
  23. W.F. Holmgren, C.W. Hansen, M.A. Mikofski, pvlib python: a python package for modeling solar energy systems, J. Open Source Softw 3, 884 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00884 [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Holmgren et al., pvlib/pvlib-python: v0.13.0 (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15614720 [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Packard, J. Wohlgemuth, S. Kurtz, Development of a visual inspection data collection tool for evaluation of fielded PV module condition, in Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) (2012). https://doi.org/10.2172/1050110 [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Mashkov, L. Leihkamm, O. Stroyuk, C. Buerhop, T. Winkler, O. Ghaffari, S. Vorstoffel, E. Wittmann, J. Hauch, I.M. Peters, High‐throughput PV module diagnostics using a compact NIR spectrometer, Sol. RRL 9, 202500323 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202500323 [Google Scholar]
  27. O. Stroyuk, C. Buerhop‐Lutz, A. Vetter, J. Hepp, J. Hauch, I.M. Peters, C.J. Brabec, Distinguishing between different types of multi‐layered PET‐based backsheets of PV modules with near‐infrared spectroscopy, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl 30, 859 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3465 [Google Scholar]
  28. O. Stroyuk, C. Buerhop, E. Wittman, O. Mashkov, P. Stephan, J. Crozier McCleland, M. Vumbugwa, F. Vorster, E. van Dyk, J. Hauch, C. Brabec, M. Peters, Assessing field degradation of photovoltaic modules by near‐infrared absorption spectroscopy of ethylene vinyl acetate encapsulant, Sol. RRL 8, 2301022 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202301022 [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Buerhop, O. Stroyuk, O. Mashkov, A. Barabash, J.A. Hauch, I.M. Peters, Polymer encapsulation impact on potential-induced degradation in PV modules revealed by a multi-modal field study, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 277, 113111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113111 [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Buerhop, O. Stroyuk, J. Zöcklein, T. Pickel, J. Hauch, I.M. Peters, Wet leakage resistance development of modules with various backsheet types, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl 30, 938 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3481 [Google Scholar]
  31. O.K. Segbefia, A.G. Imenes, T.O. Sætre, Moisture ingress in photovoltaic modules: a review, Sol. Energy 224, 889 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.055 [Google Scholar]
  32. E.M. Tonita, A.C.J. Russell, C.E. Valdivia, K. Hinzer, Optimal ground coverage ratios for tracked, fixed-tilt, and vertical photovoltaic systems for latitudes up to 75°N, Sol. Energy 258, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.038 [Google Scholar]
  33. P.H.A. Veríssimo, R.A. Campos, M.V. Guarnieri, J.P.A. Veríssimo, L.R. do Nascimento, R. Rüther, Area and LCOE considerations in utility-scale, single-axis tracking PV power plant topology optimization, Sol. Energy 211, 433 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.070 [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Khodapanah, T. Ghanbari, E. Moshksar, Z. Hosseini, Partial shading detection and hotspot prediction in photovoltaic systems based on numerical differentiation and integration of the P − V curves, IET Renew. Power Gener 17, 279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12596 [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Afridi, A. Kumar, F. ibne Mahmood, G. TamizhMani, Comparative analysis of hotspot stress endurance in pristine and thermal cycled prestressed glass–glass photovoltaic modules, Sustainability 15, 12131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612131 [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Afridi, A. Kumar, F. ibne Mahmood, G. Tamizhmani, Hotspot testing of glass/backsheet and glass/glass PV modules pre-stressed in extended thermal cycling, Sol. Energy 249, 467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Oreski, G.C. Eder, Y. Voronko, A. Omazic, L. Neumaier, W. Mühleisen, G. Ujvari, R. Ebner, M. Edler, Performance of PV modules using co-extruded backsheets based on polypropylene, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 223, 110976 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.110976 [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Mitterhofer, J. Slapšak, A. Astigarraga, D. Moser, G.O. Hernandez, P.V. Chiantore, W. Luo, Y.S. Khoo, J. Rabanal-Arabach, E. Fuentealba, P. Ferrada, M. Trigo Gonzalez, J. Ascencio-Vásquez, M. Topič, M. Jankovec, Measurement and simulation of moisture ingress in PV modules in various climates, IEEE J. Photovolt 14, 140 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2023.3323808 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.