EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 15 (2024) EPJ Photovolt., 15 (2024) 32 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 15, 2024
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2024029
Published online 16 October 2024
  1. VDMA, International technology roadmap for photovoltaic (ITRPV) 2022 results [Online]. Available: https://itrpv.vdma.org/documents/27094228/29066965/20210ITRPV/08ccda3a-585e-6a58-6afa-6c20e436cf41 [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Deline, S. MacAlpine, B. Marion, F. Toor, A. Asgharzadeh, J.S. Stein, Assessment of bifacial photovoltaic module power rating methodologies—inside and out, IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 575 (2017). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7835135 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Raina, R. Vijay, S. Sinha, Study on the optimum orientation of bifacial photovoltaic module, Int. J. Energy Res. 46, 4247 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7423 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. U.A. Yusufoglu, T.M. Pletzer, L.J. Koduvelikulathu, C. Comparotto, R. Kopecek, H. Kurz, Analysis of the annual performance of bifacial modules and optimization methods, IEEE J. Photovolt. 5, 320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2364406 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.T. Patel, M.R. Khan, X. Sun, M.A. Alam, A worldwide cost-based design and optimization of tilted bifacial solar farms, Appl. Energy 247, 467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.150 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Chudinzow, J. Haas, G. Díaz-Ferrán, S. Moreno-Leiva, L. Eltrop, Simulating the energy yield of a bifacial photovoltaic power plant, Sol. Energy 183, 812 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.071 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Rouholamini, L. Chen, C. Wang, Modeling, configuration, and grid integration analysis of bifacial PV arrays, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 12, 1242 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2020.3040427 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Bouchakour, D. Valencia-Caballero, A. Luna, E. Roman, E.A.K. Boudjelthia, P. Rodríguez, Modelling and simulation of bifacial PV production using monofacial electrical models, Energies 14, 4224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144224 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Guo, T.M. Walsh, M. Peters, Vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic modules: A global analysis, Energy 61, 447 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.R. Khan, A. Hanna, X. Sun, M.A. Alam, Vertical bifacial solar farms: physics, design, and global optimization, Appl. Energy 206, 240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.042 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.D. Rodríguez-Gallegos, M. Bieri, O. Gandhi, J.P. Singh, T. Reindl, S.K. Panda, Monofacial vs bifacial Si-based PV modules: which one is more cost-effective?, Sol. Energy 176, 412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Shigenobu, M. Ito, H. Taoka, Optimal design of bifacial PV system to mitigate duck-curve problem of power system with the UC problem, Energy Rep. 7, 7004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Jouttijärvi, G. Lobaccaro, A. Kamppinen, K. Miettunen, Benefits of bifacial solar cells combined with low voltage power grids at high latitudes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 161, 112354 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112354 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M.H. Riaz, H. Imran, R. Younas, M.A. Alam, N.Z. Butt, Module technology for agrivoltaics: vertical bifacial versus tilted monofacial farms, IEEE J. Photovolt. 11, 469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3048225 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Tsanakas, B. Herteleer, U. Jahn, Towards climate-specific O&M for PV plants: Guidelines and best practices, in Proceedings of the EU PVSEC 2023 − The 40th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference & Exhibition (Lisbonne, Portugal, 2023), pp. 020377-001–020377–006. https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC2023/4CV.1.12 [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Ferrara, D. Philipp, Why do PV modules fail?, Energy Proc. 15, 379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.046 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D.C. Jordan, K. Perry, R. White, C. Deline, Extreme weather and PV performance, IEEE J. Photovolt. 13, 830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3304357 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Matthews, J. Sandercock, Alternative energy program solar photovoltaic reference array report − March 31, 2016, Mar. 2016 [Online]. Available: https://empowerenergysolar.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/NAIT_Reference_Array_Report_March_31_2016_revD.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. K.S. Hayibo, A. Petsiuk, P. Mayville, L. Brown, J.M. Pearce, Monofacial vs bifacial solar photovoltaic systems in snowy environments, Renew. Energy 193, 657 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.050 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Granlund, J. Narvesjö, A.M. Petersson, The influence of module tilt on snow shadowing of frameless bifacial modules, in 36th Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib. (Marseille, 2019), p. 5. https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20192019-5CV.4.36 [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Molin, B. Stridh, A. Molin, E. Wackelgard, Experimental yield study of bifacial PV modules in Nordic conditions, IEEE J. Photovolt. 8, 1457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2865168 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Japan Meteorological Agency, Automated meteorological data acquisition system (AMeDAS) [Online]. Available: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/ [Google Scholar]
  23. D.G. Erbs, S.A. Klein, J.A. Duffie, Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation, Sol. Energy 28, 293 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(82)90302-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Tsuchida, Y. Tsuno, D. Sato, T. Oozeki, N. Yamada, Albedo-dependent bifacial gain losses in photovoltaic modules with rear-side support structures, IEEE J. Photovolt. 13, 938 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3317970 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Perez, R. Seals, P. Ineichen, R. Stewart, D. Menicucci, A new simplified version of the perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces, Sol. Energy 39, 221 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(87)80031-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.