EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 17 (2026) EPJ Photovolt., 17 (2026) 24 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 17, 2026
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 25
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2026016
Published online 03 July 2026
  1. A. Gupta, Y.K. Chauhan, Detailed performance analysis of realistic solar photovoltaic systems at extensive climatic conditions, Energy 116, 716 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. P.K. Pathak, A.K. Yadav, P.A. Alvi, Advanced solar MPPT techniques under uniform and non-uniform irradiance: a comprehensive review, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 142, 040801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046090 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Seyed Mahmoudian, T.K. Soon, B. Horan, A. Ghandhari, S. Mekhilef, A. Stojcevski, New ARMO-based MPPT technique to minimize tracking time and fluctuation at the output of PV systems under rapidly changing shading conditions, in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. M.M.A. Awan, A.B. Asghar, M.Y. Javed, Z. Conka, Ordering technique for the maximum power point tracking of an islanded solar photovoltaic system, Sustainability 15, 3332 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Yousri, T.S. Babu, D. Allam, V.K. Ramach, A.M.B. Etiba, A novel chaotic flower pollination algorithm for global maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions, IEEE Access 7, 121432 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Yousri, T.S. Babu, S. Mirjalili, N. Rajasekar, M.A. Elaziz, A novel objective function with artificial ecosystem-based optimization to reduce mismatch power loss in large-scale photovoltaic arrays, Energy Convers. Manage. 225, 113385 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. R.K. Pachauri, I. Kansal, T.S. Babu, H.H. Alhelou, Power losses reduction of solar PV systems under partial shading conditions using re-allocation of PV module-fixed electrical connections, IEEE Access 9, 94789 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093954 [Google Scholar]
  8. A.M. Ajmal, T.S. Babu, V.K. Ramachandaramurthy, D. Yousri, J.B. Ekanayake, Approaches for mitigating the effects of partial shading on photovoltaic arrays using static and dynamic reconfiguration, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 40, 100738 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Prince Winston, K. Ganesan, P.K.B.D. Samithas, C.B. Baladhanautham, Experimental investigation on output power enhancement of partial shaded solar photovoltaic system, Energy Sources A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 117, 9793 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. T.S. Babu, D. Yousri, K. Balasubramanian, Photovoltaic array reconfiguration system for maximizing the harvested power using population-based algorithms, IEEE Access 8, 109608109624 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Velasco-Quesada, F. Guinjoan-Gispert, R. Pique-Lopez, M. Roman-Lumbreras, A. Conesa-Roca, Electrical PV array reconfiguration strategy for energy extraction improvement in grid connected PV systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 43194331 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  12. E.R. Sanseverino, T.N. Ngoc, M. Cardinale, V. Li Vigni, D. Musso, P. Romano, F. Viola, Dynamic programming and munkres algorithm for optimal photovoltaic arrays reconfiguration, Sol. Energy 122, 347358 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Karakose, K. Murat, E. Akin, K.S. Parlak, A new efficient reconfiguration approach based on genetic algorithm in PV systems, in Proc. IEEE 23rd Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. (ISIE) (2014), p. 2328 [Google Scholar]
  14. V.S. Bhadoria, R.K. Pachauri, S. Tiwari, S.P. Jaiswal, H.H. Alhelou, Investigation of different BPD placement topologies for shaded modules in a series-parallel configured PV array, IEEE Access 8, 216911216921 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Singh, V.K. Yadav, M. Singh, A comprehensive shade resilient approach for enhanced PV array performance under irradiance mismatch conditions, IEEE J. Photovoltaics 14, 549 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2024.3374069 [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Jain, V. Kumar, S. Garg, V.K. Yadav, Cyclic heap permutation based reconfiguration of solar PV array for optimal shade dispersion, in 2024 11th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) (IEEE, Noida, India, 2024), p. 245, https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN60856.2024.10511429 [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Ameen, A. Troh´ak, A. Siddiq, R. Benotsmane, Enhancing photovoltaic array performance under partial shading through dynamic reconfiguration and layer equalization algorithm, in 2024 25th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) (Krynica Zdr´ oj, Poland, IEEE, 2024), pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC62069.2024.10569654 [Google Scholar]
  18. R.K. Pachauri, J.G. Singh, A novel approach for solar PV modules reconfiguration to achieve GMPP from partially-shaded PV array system: an experimental analysis, in 2022 22nd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC) (IEEE, New Delhi, India, 2022), p. 266, https://doi.org/10.1109/NPSC57038.2022.10069630 [Google Scholar]
  19. T.S. Babu, J.P. Ram, T. Dragicevic, M. Miyatake, F. Blaabjerg, N. Rajasekar, Particle swarm optimization based solar PV array reconfiguration of the maximum power extraction under partial shading conditions, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 9, 74 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2714905 [Google Scholar]
  20. S.N. Deshkar, S.B. Dhale, J.S. Mukherjee, T.S. Babu, N. Rajasekar, Solar PV array reconfiguration under partial shading conditions for maximum power extraction using genetic algorithm, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 43, 102 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.098 [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Yang et al., PV arrays reconfiguration for partial shading mitigation: recent advances, challenges and perspectives, Energy Convers. Manag. 247, 114738 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114738 [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Sai Krishna, T. Moger, A novel adaptive dynamic photovoltaic reconfiguration system to mitigate mismatch effects, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 141, 110754 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110754 [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Mathew et al., Parameter estimation of organic photovoltaic cells – a three-diode approach using wind-driven optimization algorithm, IEEE J. Photovoltaics 12, 327 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3129874 [Google Scholar]
  24. K.T. Swetha, B. Venugopal Reddy, An effective dual-objective optimization to enhance power generation in a two-stage grid-tied PV system under partial shading conditions, Energy 305, 132259 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132259 [Google Scholar]
  25. A.S. Yadav, V. Mukherjee, Comprehensive investigation of various bypass diode associations for killer-SuDoKu PV array under several shading conditions, Energy 239, 122014 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122014 [Google Scholar]
  26. D.S. Pillai, J.P. Ram, J.L. Garcia, Y.-J. Kim, J.P.S. Catal˜ao, Experimental studies on a new array design and maximum power tracking strategy for enhanced performance of soiled photovoltaic systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 39, 1596 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2023.3321601 [Google Scholar]
  27. P.K. Kesavan, A. Karthikeyan, M. Kumar, S. Mandal, A simple primary key algorithm based shade dispersion method for maximizing PV power generation under partial shading conditions, Chin. J. Electr. Eng. 10, 93 (2024), https://doi.org/10.23919/CJEE.2024.000067 [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Candela, E.R. Sanseverino, P. Romano, M. Cardinale, D. Musso, A dynamic electrical scheme for the optimal reconfiguration of PV modules under non-homogeneous solar irradiation, Appl. Mech. Mater. 197, 768 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.197.768 [Google Scholar]
  29. B.I. Rani, G.S. Ilango, C. Nagamani, Enhanced power generation from PV array under partial shading conditions by shade dispersion using sudoku configuration, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4, 594601 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Horouany, R. Ghandehari, Optimization of the sudoku based reconfiguration technique for PV arrays power enhancement under mutual shading conditions, Sol. Energy 159, 10371046 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. H.S. Sahu, S.K. Nayak, S. Mishra, Maximizing the power generation of a partially shaded PV array, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 4, 626637 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. A.S. Yadav, R.K. Pachauri, Y.K. Chauhan, S. Choudhury, R. Singh, Performance enhancement of partially shaded PV array using novel shade dispersion effect on magic-square puzzle configuration, Sol. Energy 144, 780797 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Vijayalekshmy, G.R. Bindu, S.R. Iyer, A novel Zig-Zag scheme for power enhancement of partially shaded solar arrays, Sol. Energy 135, 92102 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  34. N. Belhaouas, M.-S.-A. Cheikh, P. Agathoklis, M.-R. Oularbi, B. Amrouche, K. Sedraoui, N. Djilali, PV array power output maximization under partial shading using new shifted PV array arrangements, Appl. Energy 187, 326337 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  35. B. Dhanalakshmi, N. Rajasekar, Dominance square-based array reconfiguration scheme for power loss reduction in solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems, Energy Convers. Manage. 156, 84102 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. R.K. Pachauri, I. Kansal, T.S. Babu, H.H. Alhelou, Power losses reduction of solar PV systems under partial shading conditions using re-allocation of PV module-fixed electrical connections, IEEE Access 9, 94789 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3093954 [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Palpandian, D.P. Winston, B.P. Kumar, C.S. Kumar, T.S. Babu, H.H. Alhelou, A new ken-ken puzzle pattern based reconfiguration technique for maximum power extraction in partial shaded solar PV array, IEEE Access 9, 65824 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3076608 [Google Scholar]
  38. G.S. Krishna, T. Moger, Enhancement of maximum power output through reconfiguration techniques under non-uniform irradiance conditions, Energy 187, 115917 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115917 [Google Scholar]
  39. P.M. et al., A jigsaw puzzle based reconfiguration technique for enhancing maximum power in partial shaded hybrid photovoltaic array (May 18, 2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-513975/v1 [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Bonkoungou, T. Guingane, E. Korsaga, S. Tassembedo, Z. Koalaga, A. Darga, F. Zougmore, A novel topology to improve PV module efficiency under partial shading conditions, Int. J. Photoenergy 2022, 4401187 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  41. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, Attenuation of shading loss using a novel solar array reconfigured topology under partial shading conditions, Sol. Energy 274, 112552 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112552 [Google Scholar]
  42. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, A novel reconfiguration of the solar array to enhance peak power and efficiency under partial shading conditions: experimental validation, Clean Energy 7, 824 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  43. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, R.S. Bajpai, Optimized reconfiguration scheme for a photovoltaic system to boost global peak power under realistic shading conditions: experimental validation, Exp. Syst. Appl. 296, 129263 (2026), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129263 [Google Scholar]
  44. M.A. Danandeh, Comparative and comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking methods for PV cells, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 2743 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  45. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, Various modeling approaches of photovoltaic module: a comparative analysis, Majlesi J. Electr. Eng. 17, 117 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Larbes, S.M. Aït Cheikh, T. Obeidi, A. Zerguerras, Genetic algorithms optimized fuzzy logic control for the maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system, Renew. Energy 34, 2093 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.01.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. H.S. Rauschenbach, Electrical output of shadowed solar arrays, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 18, 483 (1971), https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1971.17231 [Google Scholar]
  48. J.W. Bishop, Computer simulation of the effects of electrical mismatches in photovoltaic cell interconnection circuits, Sol. Cells 25, 73 (1988), https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6787(88)90059-2 [Google Scholar]
  49. N.K. Gautam, N.D. Kaushika, An efficient algorithm to simulate the electrical performance of solar photovoltaic arrays, Energy 27, 347 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00089-5 [Google Scholar]
  50. Y.-J. Wang, P.-C. Hsu, An investigation on partial shading of PV modules with different connection configurations of PV cells, Energy 36, 3069 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.052 [Google Scholar]
  51. G.H.K. Varma, V.R. Barry, R.K. Jain, D. Kumar, An MMTES algorithm for dynamic photovoltaic array reconfiguration to enhance power output under partial shading conditions, IET Renew. Power Gen. 15, 809 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12070 [Google Scholar]
  52. Y. Jiang, J. Xu, X. Leng, N. Eghbalian, RETRACTED: a novel hybrid maximum power point tracking method based on improving the effectiveness of different configuration partial shadow, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 50, 101835 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101835 [Google Scholar]
  53. B. Yang et al., Socio-inspired democratic political algorithm for optimal PV array reconfiguration to mitigate partial shading, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 48, 101627 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101627 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hybrid, optimization, intelligent and classical PV MPPT techniques: review (CSEE JPES, 2020), https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.02720 [Google Scholar]
  55. A. Al Mansur, Md. R. Amin, Performance investigation of different PV array configurations at partial shading condition for maximum power output, in 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI) (IEEE, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Dec. 2019), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/STI47673.2019.9067998 [Google Scholar]
  56. M.D. Siddique, S. Mekhilef, N.M. Shah, A. Sarwar, A. Iqbal, M.A. Memon, A new multilevel inverter topology with reduce switch count, IEEE Access 7, 58584 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914430 [Google Scholar]
  57. R. Pachauri, A.S. Yadav, Y.K. Chauhan, A. Sharma, V. Kumar, Performance enhancement in photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading using shade dispersion techniques, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 28, e2556 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  58. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, A critical review on advanced reconfigured models and metaheuristics-based MPPT to address complex shadings of solar array, Energy Conver. Manage. 269, 116099 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  59. V.L. Mishra, Y.K. Chauhan, K.S. Verma, A new physics-based solar reconfigured model to enhance efficiency under partial shading conditions: experimental feasibility, Int. J. Green Energy 21, 589 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  60. G. Sagar, D. Pathak, P. Gaur, V. Jain, A Su Do Ku puzzle-based shade dispersion for maximum power enhancement of partially shaded hybrid bridge-link-total-cross-tied PV array, Sol. Energy 204, 161 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.