EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 17 (2026) EPJ Photovolt., 17 (2026) 16 References
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 17, 2026
Special Issue on ‘EU PVSEC 2025: State of the Art and Developments in Photovoltaics', edited by Robert Kenny and Carlos del Cañizo
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2026009
Published online 10 April 2026
  1. Global Solar Council, Global Solar Council announces 2 terawatt milestone achieved for solar. https://www.globalsolarcouncil.org/news/global-solar-council-announces-2-terawatt-milestone-achieved-for-solar/. (accessed 15 February, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  2. N.M. Haegel et al., Photovoltaics at multi-terawatt scale: waiting is not an option, Science 380, 39 (2023) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.C. Goldschmidt, L. Wagner, R. Pietzcker, L. Friedrich, Technological learning for resource efficient terawatt scale photovoltaics, Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5147 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N.M. Haegel, Photovoltaics at the Cusp: global growth and learning, Silicon Photovoltaics Conference, Oral Presentation (2025) [Google Scholar]
  5. IEA PVPS, 2025 Snapshot of Global Photovoltaic Markets, 2025. Available: https://iea-pvps.org/snapshot-reports/snapshot-2025/ [Google Scholar]
  6. Solar Power Europe, EU Market Outlook for Solar Power 2024–2028, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission, Communication from the commission to the European Perliament, The European Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan. European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN&qid=1653033742483 (accessed 20 May, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  8. European Commission, The Green Deal Industrial Plan, European Union. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/green-deal-industrial-plan_en (accessed 20 May 2025) [Google Scholar]
  9. European Commission, Factsheet: Net Zero Industry Act. European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_23_1667 (accessed 20 May 2025) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Liang, F. You, Reshoring silicon photovoltaics manufacturing contributes to decarbonization and climate change mitigation, Nat. Commun. 14, 1274 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. B.L. Willis et al., Maximising environmental savings from silicon photovoltaics manufacturing to 2035, Nat. Commun. 17, 2311 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  12. J.C. Blakesley et al., Roadmap on established and emerging photovoltaics for sustainable energy conversion, J. Phys. Energy 6, 041501 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  13. Verband Deutscher Maschinen und Anlagenbau (VDMA), International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics (ITRPV); 15th Edition, in ITRPV, VDMA, VDMA, 2024. Available: https://www.vdma.org/international-technology-roadmap-photovoltaic [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Ballif, F.-J. Haug, M. Boccard, P.J. Verlinden, G. Hahn, Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 597 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Fazal, S. Rubaiee, Progress of PV cell technology: Feasibility of building materials, cost, performance, and stability, Sol. Energy 258, 203 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO 14040, Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework, ISO, 2006. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html [Google Scholar]
  17. ISO 14044, Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines (ISO, 2006). Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14044:ed-1:v1:en [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Fthenakis et al., Methodology guidelines on life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity, IEA PVPS Task 12 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Muteri et al., Review on life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic panels, Energies 13, 252 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Fthenakis, E. Leccisi, Updated sustainability status of crystalline silicon based photovoltaic systems: Life cycle energy and environmental impact reduction trends, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 29, 1068 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Danelli, E. Brivio, P. Girardi, N. Baggio, J. Libal, Environmental life cycle assessment of passivated emitter and rear contact (perc) photovoltaic module technology, IEA PVPS Task 12 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. Wang, Y. Liu, F. Gao, B. Sun, X. Gong, Z. Nie, Environmental impact assessment of the manufacture and use of N-type and P-type photovoltaic modules in China, J. Clean. Prod. 470, 143187 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Louwen, W. Van Sark, R. Schropp, W. Turkenburg, A. Faaij, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy payback time of current and prospective silicon heterojunction solar cell designs, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 23, 1406 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Béjat et al., Design for the environment: SHJ module with ultra low carbon footprint, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 33, 184 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  25. M.M. Lunardi, J. Alvarez-Gaitan, N.L. Chang, R. Corkish, Life cycle assessment on PERC solar modules, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 187, 154 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Müller, L. Friedrich, C. Reichel, S. Herceg, M. Mittag, D.H. Neuhaus, A comparative life cycle assessment of silicon PV modules: impact of module design, manufacturing location and inventory, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 230, 111277 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P. de Wild, M. de Wild Scholten, I. Goudswaard, Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic module backsheets, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 31, 1227 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  28. X. Jia, C. Zhou, Y. Tang, W. Wang, Life cycle assessment on PERC solar modules, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 227, 111112 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Resalati, T. Okoroafor, A. Maalouf, E. Saucedo, M. Placidi, Life cycle assessment of different chalcogenide thin-film solar cells, Appl. Energy 313, 118888 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Mirletz, S. Ovaitt, S. Sridhar, T.M. Barnes, Prioritizing circular economy strategies for sustainable PV deployment at the TW scale, EPJ Photovoltaics 15, 18 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  31. A.A. Khan et al., The European Union's Ecodesign Directive–analysis of carbon footprint assessment methodology and implications for photovoltaic module manufacturers, Sol. RRL 8, 2301011 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Polverini, N. Espinosa, U. Eynard, E. Leccisi, F. Ardente, F. Mathieux, Assessing the carbon footprint of photovoltaic modules through the EU Ecodesign Directive, Sol. Energy 257, 1 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Frischknecht et al., Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems, International Energy Agency (IEA) PVPS Task 12, Report T12-19:2020, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  34. A.B. Paç, A. Gok, Assessing the environmental benefits of extending the service lifetime of solar photovoltaic modules, Glob. Chall. 8, 2300245 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Roffeis et al., New insights into the environmental performance of perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells—a life cycle assessment of industrially manufactured modules, Sustain. Energy Fuels 6, 2924 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  36. Verband Deutscher Maschinen und Anlagenbau (VDMA), International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics (ITRPV); 16th Edition, in ITRPV, VDMA, 2025 https://www.vdma.eu/en/international-technology-roadmap-photovoltaic [Google Scholar]
  37. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Outlook 2023, Vol. 2024, 2023. Available: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/IEO2023_Narrative.pdf [Google Scholar]
  38. UK Gov, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Emissions of air pollutants in the UK - Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-non-methane-volatile-organic-compounds-nmvocs (accessed 20 May, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Zhang et al., Silver-lean screen-printing metallisation for industrial TOPCon solar cells: enabling an 80% reduction in silver consumption, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 288, 113654 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  40. S. Kluska et al., Enabling savings in silver consumption and poly-Si thickness by integration of plated Ni/Cu/Ag contacts for bifacial TOPCon solar cells, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 246, 111889 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Brailovsky, L. Sanchez, D. Subasi, J. Rentsch, R. Preu, S. Nold, Photovoltaic manufacturing factories and industrial site environmental impact assessment, Energies 17, 2540 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  42. G. Guidi, A.C. Violante, S. De Iuliis, Environmental impact of electricity generation technologies: a comparison between conventional, nuclear, and renewable technologies, Energies 16, 7847 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Kim, Y. Zhang, P. Verlinden, B. Hallam, Towards sustainable silicon PV manufacturing at the terawatt level, AIP Conf. Proc. 2487, 090001 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  44. P. Padhamnath et al., Development of PV panel recycling process enabling complete recyclability of end-of-life silicon photovoltaic panels, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 286, 113571 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  45. International Energy Agency (IEA), Advances in Photovoltaic Module Recycling, 2024. Available: https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/IEA-PVPS-T12-28-2024-Report-PV-Recycling-LCI_EPRI.pdf [Google Scholar]
  46. Y. Duan, F. Guo, Z. Huang, J. Gardy, X. Jiang, C. Li, Life cycle assessment of recycling waste crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules: a comparison between traditional and green solvent recycling processes, Chem. Eng. J. 500, 157132 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  47. D. Mao et al., Overview of life cycle assessment of recycling end-of-life photovoltaic panels: case study of crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels, J. Clean. Prod. 434, 140320 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  48. M. Sodhi, L. Banaszek, C. Magee, M. Rivero-Hudec, Economic lifetimes of solar panels, Procedia CIRP 105, 782 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  49. H.-H. Fan, C. Salas-Redondo, A. Chalaux, Life cycle assessment of an innovative high-value-recovery crystalline silicon photovoltaic recycling process—the environmental impacts and benefits, EPJ Photovoltaics 15, 35 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  50. C. Xu, O. Isabella, M.R. Vogt, Future material demand for global silicon-based PV modules under net-zero emissions target until 2050, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 210, 107824 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  51. E. Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Entrepreneurship, and SMEs, Study on the critical raw materials for the EU 2023—Final report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  52. International Energy Agency, Trends in photovoltaic applications, 2023. Available: https://share.google/JdFUHDgGeqrahc9v6 [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Mertens et al., From emissions to resources: mitigating the critical raw material supply chain vulnerability of renewable energy technologies, Miner. Econ. 37, 669 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  54. Y. Cheng et al., Integration of aluminum contacts in TOPCon solar cells: a pathway to reduce silver usage, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 285, 113559 (2025) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. N. Li et al., Efficient silver leaching from end-of-life photovoltaic panels via a catalyst-free peroxymonosulfate process, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 229, 108863 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  56. Y. Zhang, M. Kim, L. Wang, P. Verlinden, B. Hallam, Design considerations for multi-terawatt scale manufacturing of existing and future photovoltaic technologies: challenges and opportunities related to silver, indium and bismuth consumption, Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5587 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Y. Cui, L. Yang, X. Wu, J. Deng, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, Recent progress of lead-free bismuth-based perovskite materials for solar cell applications, J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 16629 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  58. R.S. Pell, F. Wall, X. Yan, G. Bailey, Applying and advancing the economic resource scarcity potential (ESP) method for rare earth elements, Resour. Policy 62, 472 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  59. D. Perossa, P. Rosa, S. Terzi, A systematic literature review of existing methods and tools for the criticality assessment of raw materials: a focus on the relations between the concepts of criticality and environmental sustainability, Resources 13, 131 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  60. I. Hackenhaar et al., A critical review of criticality methods for a European Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment, Procedia CIRP 105, 428 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  61. J. Vogtländer, D. Peck, D. Kurowicka, The eco-costs of material scarcity, a resource indicator for LCA, derived from a statistical analysis on excessive price peaks, Sustainability 11, 2446 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  62. H.U. Sverdrup, O. van Allen, H.V. Haraldsson, Modeling indium extraction, supply, price, use and recycling 1930–2200 using the WORLD7 model: implication for the imaginaries of sustainable Europe 2050, Nat. Resour. Res. 33, 539 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  63. L. Wang et al., Sustainability evaluations on material consumption for terawatt scale manufacturing of silicon based tandem solar cells, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 31, 1442 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  64. P. Baliozian et al., The international technology roadmap for photovoltaics and the significance of its decade-long projections, in 37th European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (2020), Vol. 7, p. 11 [Google Scholar]
  65. LONGi, LONGi Sustainability Report 2024, 2024. Available: https://static.longi.com/2024_LON_Gi_Sustainability_Report_5edfa81533_1741819857.pdf [Google Scholar]
  66. Jinko, Jinko Sustainability Report 2024, 2024. Available: https://jinkosolar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/JinkoSolar-ESG-Report-2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  67. International Energy Agency, Renewables 2024, IEA Reports, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.