EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 17 (2026) EPJ Photovolt., 17 (2026) 1 References
Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 17, 2026
Special Issue on ‘EU PVSEC 2025: State of the Art and Developments in Photovoltaics', edited by Robert Kenny and Carlos del Cañizo
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2025023
Published online 13 January 2026
  1. K. Calvin et al., IPCC, Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups i, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)] (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland 2023), https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 [Google Scholar]
  2. I.B. Boa Morte, O.D.Q.F. Araújo, C.R.V. Morgado, J.L. de Medeiros, Electrification and decarbonization: a critical review of interconnected sectors, policies, and sustainable development goals, Energy Storage Sav. 2, 615 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2023.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ge, J. Friedrich, L. Vigna, 4 charts explain greenhouse gas emissions by countries and sectors (2024). https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors [Google Scholar]
  4. International Energy agency, Solar PV − Analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv [Google Scholar]
  5. Y.-K. Chen, J.G. Kirkerud, T.F. Bolkesjo, Balancing GHG mitigation and land-use conflicts: Alternative northern European energy system scenarios, Appl. Energy 310, 118557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118557 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Victoria, E. Zeyen, T. Brown, Speed of technological transformations required in europe to achieve different climate goals, Joule 6, 1066 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Grubler, C. Wilson, N. Bento, B. Boza-Kiss, V. Krey, D. L. McCollum, N.D. Rao, K. Riahi, J. Rogelj, S. De Stercke, J. Cullen, S. Frank, O. Fricko, F. Guo, M. Gidden, P. Havl'ık, D. Huppmann, G. Kiesewetter, P. Rafaj, W. Schoepp, H. Valin, A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °c target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies, Nat. Energy 3, 515 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Luderer, Z. Vrontisi, C. Bertram, O.Y. Edelenbosch, R.C. Pietzcker, J. Rogelj, H.S. De Boer, L. Drouet, J. Emmerling, O. Fricko, S. Fujimori, P. Havlík, G. Iyer, K. Keramidas, A. Kitous, M. Pehl, V. Krey, K. Riahi, B. Saveyn, M. Tavoni, D.P. Van Vuuren, E. Kriegler, Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1. 5 °c pathways, Nat. Climate Change 8, 626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Späth, Large-scale photovoltaics? yes please, but not like this! insights on different perspectives underlying the trade-off between land use and renewable electricity development, Energy Policy 122, 429 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.029 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Koelman, T. Hartmann, T. Spit, Land use conflicts in the energy transition: Dutch dilemmas, J. Land Use Mobility Environ. 11, 273 (2018). https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5830 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Scherhaufer, S. Höltinger, B. Salak, T. Schauppenlehner, J. Schmidt, Patterns of acceptance and non-acceptance within energy landscapes: A case study on wind energy expansion in austria, Energy Policy 109, 863 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.057 [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Ioannidis, D. Koutsoyiannis, A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact, Appl. Energy 276, 115367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115367 [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Kati, C. Kassara, Z. Vrontisi, A. Moustakas, The biodiversity-wind energy-land use nexus in a global biodiversity hotspot, Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144471 [Google Scholar]
  14. Energeia, Solkraftverk i norge (2023). https://www.energeia.no/solkraft-i-norge-perspektivnotat [Google Scholar]
  15. Statnett, Statnetts kortsiktige markedsanalyse (2021) https://www.statnett.no/om-statnett/nyheter-og-pressemeldinger/nyhetsarkiv-2022/kortsiktig-markedsanalyseokende-forbruk-gir-kraftunderskudd-fra-2027/ [Google Scholar]
  16. M.K. Hoffacker, M.F. Allen, R.R. Hernandez, Land-sparing opportunities for solar energy development in agricultural landscapes: A case study of the great central valley, CA, united states, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 14472, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05110 [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Kakoulaki, N. Taylor, S. Szabo, R. Kenny, A. Chatzipanagi, A. Jäger-Waldau, Communication on the potential of applied PV in the european union: Rooftops, reservoirs, roads (r3), EPJ Photovolt. 15, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2023035 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Bolwig, T.F. Bolkesjo, A. Klitkou, P.D. Lund, C. Bergaentzl'e, K. Borch, O.J. Olsen, J.G. Kirkerud, Y.-k. Chen, P.A. Gunkel, K. Skytte, Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno740 economic and socio-technical approaches in the nordic-baltic region, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 67, 101559 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101559 [Google Scholar]
  19. R. McKenna, I. Mulalic, I. Soutar, J.M. Weinand, J. Price, S. Petrovi'c, K. Mainzer, Exploring trade-offs between landscape impact, land use and resource quality for onshore variable renewable energy: an application to great britain, Energy 250, 123754 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123754 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Scherhaufer, S. Höltinger, B. Salak, T. Schauppenlehner, J. Schmidt, A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind energy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 45, 164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.022 [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Fournis, M.-J. Fortin, From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: towards a territorial perspective, J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 60, 1 (2017). arXiv: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1133406 [Google Scholar]
  22. J.B. Geraint Ellis, C. Robinson, Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals, J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 50, 517 (2007). arXiv: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701402075 [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Wüstenhagen, M. Wolsink, M.J. Bürer, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept, Energy Policy 35, 2683 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D.-J. van de Ven, I. Capellan-Peréz, I. Arto, I. Cazcarro, C. de Castro, P. Patel, M. Gonzalez-Eguino, The potential land requirements and related land use change emissions of solar energy, Sci. Rep. 11, 2907 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82042-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Turkovska, K. Gruber, M. Klingler, C. Klöckl, L. Ramirez Camargo, P. Regner, S. Wehrle, J. Schmidt, Methodological and reporting inconsistencies in land-use requirements misguide future renewable energy planning, One Earth 7, 1741 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Lovering, M. Swain, L. Blomqvist, R.R. Hernandez, Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow's energy landscape, PLOS One 17, e0270155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270155 [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Capellán-Pérez, C. de Castro, I. Arto, Assessing vulnerabilities and limits in the transition to renewable energies: Land requirements under 100% solar energy scenarios, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77, 760 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.137 [Google Scholar]
  28. U. Fritsche, G. Berndes, A. Cowie, F. Johnson, V. Dale, H. Langeveld, N. Sharma, H. Watson, J. Woods, Energy and land use − global land outlook working paper, UNCCD and IRENA (2017). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24905.44648. [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Denholm, P. Brown, W. Cole, T. Mai, B. Sergi, M. Brown, P. Jadun, J. Ho, J. Mayernik, C. McMillan, R. Sreenath, Examining supply-side options to achieve 100% clean electricity by 2035, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A40-81644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2172/1885591. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1885591 [Google Scholar]
  30. J.E. Diffendorfer, B. Sergi, A. Lopez, T. Williams, M. Gleason, Z. Ancona, W. Cole, The interplay of future solar energy, land cover change, and their projected impacts on natural lands and croplands in the US, Sci. Total Environ. 947, 173872 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173872 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Bolinger, G. Bolinger, Land requirements for utility-scale PV: An empirical update on power and energy density, IEEE. J. Photovolt. 12, 589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3136805 [Google Scholar]
  32. C. de Castro, M. Mediavilla, L.J. Miguel, F. Frechoso, Global solar electric potential: A review of their technical and sustainable limits, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 28, 824 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.040 [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Martín-Chivelet, Photovoltaic potential and land-use estimation methodology, Energy 94, 233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.108 [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Ong, C. Campbell, P. Denholm, R. Margolis, G. Heath, Land-use requirements for solar power plants in the united states, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-56290 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2172/1086349 [Google Scholar]
  35. J. van Zalk, P. Behrens, The spatial extent of renewable and non-renewable power generation: A review and meta-analysis of power densities and their application in the u.s., Energy Policy 123, 83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Denholm, M. Hand, M. Jackson, S. Ong, Land use requirements of modern wind power plants in the united states, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-45834 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2172/964608 [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Saunders, Land use requirements of solar and wind power generation: understanding a decade of academic research (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. M.S. Kenawi, R.D. Hedger, K.T. Alfredsen, B.K. Sandercock, M. Korpås, T.H. Bakken, Land efficiency of renewable energy in Norway: A synthesis of footprint and production density, Renew. Energy 252, 123514 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123514 [Google Scholar]
  39. NVE, Direkte påvirket areal − NVE (2022). https://www.nve.no/energi/energisystem/vindkraft-paa-land/arealbruk-for-vindkraftverk/direkte-paavirket-areal/ [Google Scholar]
  40. A.M. Trainor, R.I. McDonald, J. Fargione, Energy sprawl is the largest driver of land use change in united states, PLOS One 11, e0162269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162269 [Google Scholar]
  41. U.R. Fritsche, G. Berndes, A.L. Cowie, V.H. Dale, K.L. Kline, F.X. Johnson, H. Langeveld, N. Sharma, H. Watson, J. Woods Energy Land Use, Global Land Outlook Working Paper 14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Ong, C. Campbell, P. Denholm, R. Margolis, G. Heath, Land-Use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-0, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States) (Jun. 2013). https://doi.org/10.2172/1086349 [Google Scholar]
  43. International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook − Topics (2025). https://www.iea.org/topics [Google Scholar]
  44. J.K. Noland, J. Auxepaules, A. Rousset, B. Perney, G. Falletti, Spatial energy density of large-scale electricity generation from power sources worldwide, Sci. Rep. 12, 21280 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25341-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Energy facts Norway, Electricity production. https://energifaktanorge.no/en/norsk-energiforsyning/kraftproduksjon/ [Google Scholar]
  46. Renewables.ninja, Renewables.ninja. https://www.renewables.ninja/ [Google Scholar]
  47. O.-M. Midtgard, T.O. Satre, G. Yordanov, A.G. Imenes, C. L. Nge, A qualitative examination of performance and energy yield of photovoltaic modules in southern Norway, Renew. Energy 35, 1266 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  48. NVE, NVE Temakart. https://temakart.nve.no/ [Google Scholar]
  49. M.Z. Jacobson, M.A. Delucchi, Z.A.F. Bauer, S.C. Goodman, W.E. Chapman, M.A. Cameron, C. Bozonnat, L. Chobadi, H.A. Clonts, P. Enevoldsen, J.R. Erwin, S.N. Fobi, O.K. Goldstrom, E.M. Hennessy, J. Liu, J. Lo, C.B. Meyer, S.B. Morris, K.R. Moy, P.L. O'Neill, I. Petkov, S. Redfern, R. Schucker, M.A. Sontag, J. Wang, E. Weiner, A.S. Yachanin, 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world, Joule 1, 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  50. M.Z. Jacobson, M.A. Delucchi, M.A. Cameron, B.V. Mathiesen, Matching demand with supply at low cost in 139 countries among 20 world regions with 100% intermittent wind, water, and sunlight (wws) for all purposes, Renew. Energy 123, 236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. A. Grubler, C. Wilson, N. Bento, B. Boza-Kiss, V. Krey, D.L. McCollum, N.D. Rao, K. Riahi, J. Rogelj, S. De Stercke, J. Cullen, S. Frank, O. Fricko, F. Guo, M. Gidden, P. Havl'ık, D. Huppmann, G. Kiesewetter, P. Rafaj, W. Schoepp, H. Valin, A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies, Nat. Energy 3, 515 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6 [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Bogdanov, A. Gulagi, M. Fasihi, C. Breyer, Full energy sector transition towards 100% renewable energy supply: Integrating power, heat, transport and industry sectors including desalination, Appl. Energy 283, 116273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116273 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. C. Breyer, D. Bogdanov, A. Gulagi, A. Aghahosseini, L.S. Barbosa, O. Koskinen, M. Barasa, U. Caldera, S. Afanasyeva, M. Child, J. Farfan, P. Vainikka, On the role of solar photovoltaics in global en858 ergy transition scenarios, Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 25, 727 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2885 [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Gielen, F. Boshell, D. Saygin, M.D. Bazilian, N. Wagner, R. Gorini, The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, Energy Strategy Rev. 24, 38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  55. C.C. Perpiña, F.C. Hormigos, C. Dorati, G. Kakoulaki, L. Peeters, E. Quaranta, N. Taylor, A. Uihlein, D. Auteri, L. Dijkstra, Renewable energy production and potential in EU rural areas (2024). https://doi.org/10.2760/458970 [Google Scholar]
  56. M.J. Pasqualetti, Social barriers to renewable energy landscapes, Geographical Review 101, 201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00087.x [Google Scholar]
  57. L. S. Giordono, H. S. Boudet, A. Karmazina, C. L. Taylor, B. S. Steel, Opposition “overblown”? community response to wind energy siting in the western united states1, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43, 119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  58. E. Baraja-Rodríguez, D. Herrero-Luque, B. P'erez-P'erez, A country of windmills, in Renewable Energies and European Landscapes: Lessons from Southern European Cases, M. Frolova, M.-J. Prados, A. Nada (Springer, Netherlands, 2015), pp. 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3 [Google Scholar]
  59. M. Mérida-Rodríguez, R. Lobón-Martín, M.-J. Perles-Roselló, The production of solar photovoltaic power and its landscape dimension, in Renewable Energies and European Landscapes: Lessons from Southern European Cases (Springer, Netherlands) pp. 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_14 [Google Scholar]
  60. T. Bevk, M. Golobič, Contentious eye-catchers: Perceptions of landscapes changed by solar power plants in slovenia, Renew. Energy 152, 999 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.108 [Google Scholar]
  61. A. Codemo, A. Barbini, A. Mantouza, A. Bitziadis, R. Albatici, Integration of public perception in the assessment of licensed solar farms: A case study in greece, Sustainability 15, 9899 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139899 [Google Scholar]
  62. P. Picchi, M. van Lierop, D. Geneletti, S. Stremke, Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review, Ecosyst. Serv. 35, 241 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  63. J. Gaede, I.H. Rowlands, Visualizing social acceptance research: A bibliometric review of the social acceptance literature for energy technology and fuels, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40, 142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  64. P. Roddis, K. Roelich, K. Tran, S. Carver, M. Dallimer, G. Ziv, What shapes community acceptance of large-scale solar farms? a case study of the UK's first ‘nationally significant’ solar farm, Sol. Energy 209, 235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.065 [Google Scholar]
  65. K. van den. Berg, B. Tempels, The role of community benefits in community acceptance of multifunctional solar farms in the netherlands, Land Use Policy 122, 106344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106344 [Google Scholar]
  66. European Union, Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality (European Climate Law) − Climate Change Laws of the World. https://climate-laws.org/document/regulation-eu-2021-1119-establishing-the-framework-for-achieving-climate-neutrality-european-climate-law_df60 [Google Scholar]
  67. H. Dinesh, J.M. Pearce, The potential of agrivoltaic systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54, 299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. S. Amaducci, X. Yin, M. Colauzzi, Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production, Appl. Energy 220, 545 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.081 [Google Scholar]
  69. Fraunhofer ISE, Agrivoltaics: Opportunities for Agriculture and the Energy Transition − Fraunhofer ISE (2024). https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/agrivoltaics-opportunities-for-agriculture-and-the-energy916 transition.html [Google Scholar]
  70. Clean Energy Council, Australian guide to agrisolar for large-scale solar | Clean Energy Council (2021). https://assets.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/documents/resources/reports/agrisolar-guide/Australian-guide-to-agrisolar-for-large-scale-solar.pdf [Google Scholar]
  71. P.P. Chinaris, G.N. Psarros, S.A. Papathanassiou, Hybridization of wind farms with co-located PV and storage instal920 lations, Renew. Energy 240, 122057 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122057 [Google Scholar]
  72. A.H. Schleifer, D. Harrison-Atlas, W.J. Cole, C.A. Murphy, Hybrid renewable energy systems: the value of storage as a function of PV-wind variability, Front. Energy Res. 11, 1036183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1036183 [Google Scholar]
  73. DNV, Energy Transition Outlook 2024. https://www.connaissancedesenergies.org/sites/connaissancedesenergies.org/files/pdf-actualites/DNV_ETO_2024_Main_Report_highres.pdf [Google Scholar]
  74. S. Kallbekken, S.W. Skjeflo, N.B. Westberg, E.O. Jåstad, Green dilemmas: Public opposition and support for Norway's energy transition, Energy 334, 137860 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137860 [Google Scholar]
  75. M. Chang, K. Espegren, K. Haaskjold, E. Rosenberg, S. Damman, T. Mäkitie, P. Pisciella, A.D. Andersen, T.M. Skjolsvold, Transition pathways for a low-carbon norway: bridging socio-technical and energy system analyses (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58897-6_9 [Google Scholar]
  76. Multiconsult, Sol kan bli like stort som vannkraft i Norge, Renewable energy production and potential in EU rural areas (2022). https://www.multiconsult.no/sol-kan-bli-like-stort-som-vannkraft-i-norge/ [Google Scholar]
  77. H. Gholami, Technical potential of solar energy in buildings across Norway: capacity and demand, Sol. Energy 278, 112758 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112758 [Google Scholar]
  78. S.F. Myhre, E. Rosenberg, The Role and Impact of Rooftop Photovoltaics in the Norwegian Energy System under Different Energy Transition Pathways, Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 6, 2400184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202400184 [Google Scholar]
  79. P.K.N. Haaland, V. Aubin, M. Korpås, Quantifying energy-related carbon emissions of low-emission neighborhoods: A comparison of different approaches [unpublished manuscript] (2025) [Google Scholar]
  80. J.D. Jenkins, N.A. Sepulveda, Enhanced decision support for a changing electricity landscape: The GenX configurable electricity resource capacity expansion model, MIT Energy Initiative Working Paper (2017) [Google Scholar]
  81. P. Haaland, Integration-of-solar-PV-in-a-Norwegian-energy-system, original-date: 2025−06-06T08:53:00Z (Jun. 2025) https://github.com/pkhaaland/Integration-of-solar-PV-in-a-Norwegian-energy-system [Google Scholar]
  82. Hydrologiske data − NVE. https://www.nve.no/vann-og-vassdrag/hydrologiske-data/ [Google Scholar]
  83. Power Statistics, Power statistics. https://www.entsoe.eu/data/power-stats/ [Google Scholar]
  84. World Economic Forum, G7 countries agree phaseout for unabated coal power, and other top energy stories (2024). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/05/energy-news-g7-coal-phaseout-renewables-batteries/ [Google Scholar]
  85. M. Korpås, L. Warland, J. Tande, K. Uhlen, Tradewind D3.2 Grid modelling and power system data (2007) [Google Scholar]
  86. M. Jafari, M. Korpås, A. Botterud, Power system decarbonization: Impacts of energy storage duration and interannual renewables variability, Renew. Energy 156, 1171 (2020). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120306820 [Google Scholar]
  87. ENTSO-E and ENTSOG, ENTSO-e and ENTSOG TYNDP 2024 draft scenarios report (2025). https://2024.entsos-tyndp-scenarios.eu/ [Google Scholar]
  88. Our World in Data, Carbon dioxide emissions factors (2023). https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-dioxide-emissions-factor [Google Scholar]
  89. M. Karmellos, D. Kopidou, D. Diakoulaki, A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the european union countries, Energy 94, 680 (2016). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215015406 [Google Scholar]
  90. European Commision, EU reference scenario 2020 − european commission. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/energy-modelling/eu-reference-scenario-2020_en [Google Scholar]
  91. IEA, Norway − Countries & Regions. https://www.iea.org/countries/norway/efficiency-demand [Google Scholar]
  92. NVE, Langsiktig kraftmarkedsanalyse − NVE. https://www.nve.no/energi/analyser-og-statistikk/langsiktig-kraftmarkedsanalyse/ [Google Scholar]
  93. ENTSO-E, Major trends reshaping the power sector — ENTSO-e vision on market design and system operation towards 2030. https://vision2030.entsoe.eu/major-trends-reshaping-the-power-sector/ [Google Scholar]
  94. W. Cole, A. Karmakar, Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage : 2023 update, Renew. Energy (2023) [Google Scholar]
  95. J.P. Deane, B.P.Ó. Gallachóir, E.J. McKeogh, Techno-economic review of existing and new pumped hydro energy storage plant, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 1293 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.015 [Google Scholar]
  96. A. Valberg, F.N. Institutt, Vindkraft: Vinden som snudde, section: miljo (2021). https://www.forskning.no/energi-fornybar-energi-fridtjof-nansens-institutt/vindkraft-vinden-som-snudde/1824096 [Google Scholar]
  97. World Wildlife Fund, Ny rapport: − norge har bygget vindkraft p°a feil steder (2020). https://www.wwf.no/nyheter/ny-rapport-norge-har-bygget-vindkraft-pa-feil-steder [Google Scholar]
  98. European Commision, Climate strategies & targets − European Commission (1999). https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets_en [Google Scholar]
  99. J.O.G. Tande, K. Vogstad, OPERATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF WIND POWER IN A HYDRO BASED POWER SYSTEM, in 1999 European Wind Energy Conference (1999, Nice, France) https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315074337-103/operational-implications-wind-power-hydro-based-power-system-john-olav-giæver-tande-klaus-ole-vogsta [Google Scholar]
  100. SSB, 1294 2: Classes of land use and land cover (per cent) (M) 2020–2025. Statbank Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/list/arealstat [Google Scholar]
  101. Norwegian Environment Agency, Forslag om endring av plan- og bygningsloven − forbud mot nedbygging av myr (2025). https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/hoeringer/2025/juli-2025/forslag-om-endring-av-plan-og-bygningsloven--forbud-mot-nedbygging-av-myr/ [Google Scholar]
  102. European Commision, Energy consumption in households (2025). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_consumption_in_households [Google Scholar]
  103. Energifakta Norge, Energy use by sector (2025). https://energifaktanorge.no/en/norsk-energibruk/energibruken-i-ulike-sektorer/ [Google Scholar]
  104. Country Reports, Norway geography, maps, climate, environment and terrain from Norway | − CountryReports. https://www.countryreports.org/country/Norway/geography.htm [Google Scholar]
  105. J.A. Dowling, K.Z. Rinaldi, T.H. Ruggles, S.J. Davis, M. Yuan, F. Tong, N.S. Lewis, K. Caldeira, Role of long-duration energy storage in variable renewable electricity systems, Joule 4, 1907 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  106. J. Meyers, C. Meneveau, Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers, Wind Energy 15, 305 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/we.469 [Google Scholar]
  107. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Cancellations reduce expected U.S. capacity of offshore wind facilities (2024). https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=62445 [Google Scholar]
  108. V. Ramasamy, J. Zuboy, M. Woodhouse, E. O'Shaughnessy, D. Feldman, J. Desai, A. Walker, R. Margolis, P. Basore, U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System and Energy Storage Cost Benchmarks, With Minimum Sustainable Price Analysis: Q1 2023, Technical Report NREL/TP-7A40-87303 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  109. IEA, Approximately 100 million households rely on rooftop solar PV by 2030 −Analysis (Sep. 2022). https://www.iea.org/reports/approximately-100-million-households-rely-on-rooftop-solar-pv-by-2030 [Google Scholar]
  110. R.R. Hernandez, A. Armstrong, J. Burney, G. Ryan, K. Moore-O'Leary, I. Di'edhiou, S.M. Grodsky, L. Saul-Gershenz, R. Davis, J. Macknick, D. Mulvaney, G.A. Heath, S.B. Easter, M.K. Hoffacker, M.F. Allen, D.M. Kammen, Techno-ecological synergies of solar energy for global sustainability, Nat. Sustain. 2, 560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0309-z [Google Scholar]
  111. H. Ritchie, How does the land use of different electricity sources compare?, Our World in Data (Jun. 2022). https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-per-energy-source [Google Scholar]
  112. UNECE, Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options | UNECE (2021). https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options [Google Scholar]
  113. IRENA, Transition to Renewables Calls for New Approach to Energy Security (Apr. 2024). https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2024/Apr/Transition-to-Renewables-Calls-for-New-Approach-to-Energy-Security [Google Scholar]
  114. IPBES, Nature's Contributions to People (NCP) − Article by IPBES Experts in Science | IPBES secretariat (Oct. 2018). https://www.ipbes.net/node/16566 [Google Scholar]
  115. Norwegian Environment Agency, Norges verneområder. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/ansvarsomrader/vernet-natur/norges-verneomrader/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.