Issue
EPJ Photovolt.
Volume 16, 2025
Special Issue on ‘EU PVSEC 2024: State of the Art and Developments in Photovoltaics’, edited by Robert Kenny and Gabriele Eder
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2025003
Published online 05 February 2025
  1. M.A. Sturchio, J.E. Macknick, G.A. Barron-Gafford, A. Chen, C. Alderfer, K. Condon, O.L. Hajek, B. Miller, B. Pauletto, J.A. Siggers, I.J. Slette, A.K. Knapp, Grassland productivity responds unexpectedly to dynamic light and soil water environments induced by photovoltaic arrays, Ecol. 13, e4334 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4334 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Armstrong, N.J. Ostle, J. Whitaker, Solar park microclimate and vegetation management effects on grassland carbon cycling, Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074016 [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Liu, T. Peng, S. Ma, C. Qi, Y. Song, C. Zhang, K. Li, N. Gao, M. Pu, X. Wang, Y. Bi, X. Na, Potential benefits and risks of solar photovoltaic power plants on arid and semi-arid ecosystems: an assessment of soil microbial and plant communities, Front. Microbiol. 14, 1190650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1190650 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Pardon, B. Reubens, D. Reheul, J. Mertens, P. De Frenne, T. Coussement, P. Janssens, K. Verheyen, Trees increase soil organic carbon and nutrient availability in temperate agroforestry systems, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 247, 98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C.E. Prescott, L. Vesterdal, Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter to soil organic mattter in forest soils, Forest Ecol. Manag. 498, 119522 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119522 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Semchenko, M. Lepik, L. Götzenberger, K. Zobel, Positive effect of shade on plant growth: Amelioration of stress or active regulation of growth rate? J. Ecol. 100, 459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01936.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E.M. Abraham, A.P. Kyriazopoulos, Z.M. Parissi, P. Kostopoulou, M. Karatassiou, K. Anjalanidou, C. Katsouta, Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments, Agrofor. Syst. 88, 287 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9682-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Siebenkäs, J. Schumacher, C. Roscher, Phenotypic plasticity to light and nutrient availability alters functional trait ranking across eight perennial grassland species, AoB Plants 7, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Schotman, F. van der Zee, G. Hazeu, J. Bloem, J. Sluijsmans, M. Vittek, M. Verkenning van bodem en vegetatie in 25 zonneparken in Nederland: Eerste overzicht van de ligging van zonneparken in Nederland en stand van de kennis over het effect van zonneparken op de bodemkwaliteit. (Rapport / Wageningen Environmental Research; No. 3061). Wageningen Environmental Research (2021). https://doi.org/10.18174/541057 [Google Scholar]
  10. C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.G.M. Knegt, K. van Wijngaarden, P. Verweij, M. Soons, Ecological impacts of ground-mounted solar parks on local vegetation − vegetation, soil, and microclimate in thirteen solar parks in the Netherlands, Landschap 38, 80 (2021). https://www.landschap.nl/archief/jaargang-38-2021 [Google Scholar]
  12. Q. Lambert, A. Bischoff, S. Cueff, A. Cluchier, R. Gros, Effects of solar park construction and solar panels on soil quality, microclimate, CO2 effluxes, and vegetation under a Mediterranean climate, Land Degrad. Develop. 32, 5190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4101 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Q. Lambert, R. Gros, A. Bischoff, Ecological restoration of solar park plant communities and the effect of solar panels, Ecolog. Eng. 182, 106722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106722 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Uldrijan, J. Winkler, M.D. Vaverková, Bioindication of environmental conditions using solar park vegetation, Environments 10, 86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10050086 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Chen, B. Chen, Y. Wang, N. Zhou, Z. Zhou, Response of vegetation and soil property changes by photovoltaic established stations based on a comprehensive meta-analysis, Land 13, 478 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.K. Knapp, M.A. Sturchio, Ecovoltaics in an increasingly water-limited world: An ecological perspective, One Earth 7, 1705 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.09.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. de Jonge, M. Ram, Sturen op meervoudige doelen, Netherlands Board of Government Advisors (2021). Available from: Advies over een grootschalig zonnepark in de Noordoostpolder | Publicatie | College van Rijksadviseurs [Google Scholar]
  18. B.B. Van Aken, A. Binani, I. Cesar, Towards nature-inclusive east-west oriented solar parks, TNO report R11087 (2021). https://resolver.tno.nl/uuid:f39ccb4e-6a9e-43a4-9aa3-6432c5df8fd0 [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Cesar, B.B. Van Aken, L. Scholten, R. de Goede, A. Schotman, Nieuwe ontwerptoets verankert bodemkwaliteit in zonneparken, Bodem 2, 346 (2022). Available from: Bodem 2022-02 − Bodembreedacademie [Google Scholar]
  20. Royal Horticultural Society. Shade gardening. https://www.rhs.org.uk/garden-design/shade-gardening [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Biesmeijer, L. van Kolfschoten, F. Wit, M. Moens, The effects of solar parks on plants and pollinators: the case of Shell Moerdijk, Naturalis report 2019–001 (2019). Available from: Naturalis report 2019-001 [Google Scholar]
  22. A.R. Burgers, B. Geerligs, A.J. Carr, A. Gutjahr, D. Saynova, G. Li, X. Zhuo, W. Hongfang, A. Haijiao, Z. Hu, P.R. Venema, A.H.G. Vlooswijk, 19.5% efficient n-type Si solar cells made in production, in Proceedings of 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (Hamburg, Germany, 2011). https://doi.org/10.4229/26thEUPVSEC2011-2DO.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Goda, in Proceedings of 11th CSPV (Hangzhou, China, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. B.B. Van Aken, L.A.G. Okel, J. Liu, S.L. Luxembourg, J. van Roosmalen, White bifacial modules − improved STC performance combined with bifacial energy yield, in Proceedings of 32nd EU PVSEC (Munich, Germany, 2016). https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20162016-1BO.12.2 [Google Scholar]
  25. M.H. Saw, Y.S. Khoo, J.P. Singh, Y. Wang, Enhancing optical performance of bifacial PV modules, Environ. Proc. 124, 484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.285 [Google Scholar]
  26. G.J.M. Janssen, B.B. Van Aken, A.J. Carr, A.A. Mewe, Outdoor performance of bifacial modules by measurements and modelling, Environ. Proc. 77, 364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.051 [Google Scholar]
  27. A.R. Burgers, BIGEYE − simulation under shadow conditions, in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Bifacial PV (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  28. G.J.M. Janssen, A.R. Burgers, A. Binani, A.J. Carr, B.B. Van Aken, I.G. Romijn, M. Klenk, H. Nussbaumer, T. Baumann, How to maximize the kWh/kWp ratio: simulations of single-axis tracking in bifacial systems, in Proceedings of the 35th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (2018), p. 1573. https://doi.org/10.4229/35thEUPVSEC20182018-6BO.7.5 [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Nussbaumer, G.J.M. Janssen, D. Berrian, B. Wittmer, M. Klenk, T. Baumann, F. Baumgartner, M. Morf, A.R. Burgers, J. Libal, A. Mermoud, Accuracy of simulated data for bifacial systems with varying tilt angles and share of diffuse radiation, Sol. Energy 197, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.071 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. D.G. Erbs, S.A. Klein, J.A. Duffie, Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation, Sol. Energy 28, 293 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(82)90302-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Vartiainen, G. Masson, C. Breyer, PV LCOE in Europe 2014-30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4669.5520 [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Lensink, E. Eggink, K. Schoots, Eindadvies basisbedragen SDE++ 2024. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (2024) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.