A multicriteria analysis of the potential degradations of a photovoltaic module to assess its robustness

Special Issue on ‘Recent Advances in Photovoltaics 2022’, edited by Mohamed Amara, Thomas Fix, Jean-Paul Kleider, Judikaël Le Rouzo and Denis Mencaraglia

Open Access

Table 2

Range of variations for the degrees of degradation.

	Range of variation for D
Parameter X	Values				Relative percentages	Weight α_i
	KG200GT	Q6LM.m	MSX60	PW1650
I_sc	[0 ; 8.21]	[0 ; 7.16]	[0 ; 3.8]	[0 ; 5.1]	[0 ; 100%]	1
V_oc	[0 ; 32.9]	[0 ; 0.6118]	[0 ; 21.1]	[0 ; 43.2]	[0 ; 100%]	1
R_s	[0.221 ; 2.43]	[0.0012 ; 0,12]	[0.2 ; 20.2]	[0.72 ; 72.72]	[100% ; 1000%]	0.1
R_sh	[0 ; 415.405]	[0.5 ; 5.0001]	[30.48 ; 304.83]	[201.36 ; 2013.581]	[0 ; 100%]	1

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.