Table 1
FPV gains reported in literature along with theory justifying the enhancement. (∗E = Experimental, S = Simulation, X = Estimation).
| System and technique∗ | Gain (%) | Supported theory | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPV [29], E. | 2.24% power, 0.79% η |
NA | 8-hour experiment. |
| FPV [39], S. | 1.58–2%. | 2 and 3. | NA |
| FPV [22], X. | 20–25%. | NA. | Claim from the developers of a plant in Bubano, Italy. |
| FPV [40], E. | 7.6%, 13.5% and 10.3%. |
NA. | For systems of 2.4kW, 100kW and 500kW respectively. |
| FPV [26], E. | 3% power | 1. | Five-month experiment. |
| FPV [41], E. | 2.48%. | NA. | Gain is the annual average. |
| FPV [42], E. | 2.33%. | 3. | NA |
| FPV [43], E. | 13.5%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [34], E. | 11%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [20], E. | 9.52−14.5%. | NA. | Four−day experiment. |
| FPV [44], E. | 3 and 6%. | 2 and 3. | The 3% gain is for the Netherlands and 6% for Singapore. |
| FPV [45], E. | 0.11–0.61%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [16], E. | 31.29% power. |
2. | NA |
| FPV [15], S. | 12.96–18%. | 2 and 3. | The reported gain is annual. |
| FPV[46], S. | 18%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [33], E. | 10.2%. | 1 and 3. | NA |
| FPV [13], E. | 10%. | 1 and 2. | NA |
| FPV [47], E. | 0.3%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [47], S. | 2.67%. | NA. | NA |
| FPV [48], X. | 1.8%. | NA. | Estimated efficiency gain due to 4∘C temperature difference. |
| FPV [49], S. | 7.5%. | 1. | NA |
| FPV [50], S. | 0.31–0.46% for design 1, 1.81–2.59% for design 2. |
NA. | Design 1 refers to large foot- print design. Design 2 refers to a small footprint design that experiences better ventilation. |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.