Table 1

Summary of the calculated trap properties for both investigated deposition series and for samples with and without PDT. In all cases, different evaluation methods have been used to determine the trap properties (manual maximum analysis and DLTFS evaluations). Therefore an average and standard deviation is given for each variation and each trap.

Treatment Doping cm−3 Voc mV Type Energy EVET meV σn,p cm2 Trap Density NTcm−3
Series I w/o PDT 4.5 × 1015 709 E1 425 ± 25 1.2 × 10−15 (6.0 ± 3.0) × 1013
  w/ PDT 8.3 × 1015 716 E1 418 ± 22 4.2 × 10−12 (1.6 ± 0.5) × 1013
        H1 198 ± 22 1.4 × 10−17 (1.2 ± 0.3) × 1013
Series II w/o PDT 1.4 × 1016 687 E1 451 ± 32 1.5 × 10−14 (2.3 ± 0.3) × 1013
      H2 608 ± 8 1.2 × 10−15 (2.5 ± 1.5) × 1013
  w/ PDT 2.3 × 1016 710 E1 459 ± 11 4.7 × 10−13 (7.8 ± 2.3) × 1012
        H2 641 ± 16 2.1 × 10−14 (3.1 ± 0.9) × 1013

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.